Notes From the Author:

From the very beginning I wanted to do something different, take what currently exists in the realm of horror and mold it into a new form. From the premise alone it barrows from the sociological considerations of Frankenstein, but, of course, Frankenstein never engaged in a killing spree. In fact, the Bleeder’s position as this monstrous entity increases because of this differential outlook. The Bleeder, due to the extensive brain damage that resulted from his operation, is completely alien to anything and everything. His thought process remains, and though he can remember bits and pieces, the grasp of ethical and moral concepts only begins to emerge in the later episodes. Frankenstein examined how society reacts towards things far too strange to accept. There is a limit to what people can tolerate and we see this exemplified in racial clashes. If people of different ethnical background struggle with discrimination, then what would happen if you place an entity with extreme characteristics? While that alone is a great statement to build off of, I would only be echoing the same statement if I skinned the story of its gruesome, villainous layers. Thus, another reason for why I decided to make the Bleeder engage in these horrible acts.
 

Other Notes:

“The inclusion of a dismal economy [runs] rampant throughout the episodes and works brilliantly as a sturdy canvas for the illustrated horrors.” Dan Dilks Jr.